At 10 locations, you can manage vendors with relationships and quick workarounds. At 100+ locations, those workarounds become the job.
The vendor chase is a persistent operational drain in multi-site facilities management. It rarely shows up as a single catastrophic failure. Instead, it shows up as constant follow-up. Status checks. Escalations. Reopened tickets. Invoices that don’t match expectations. Store managers who feel they have to babysit every repair.
At scale, that friction becomes structural. Once it becomes structural, it starts to affect everything else: uptime, customer experience, frontline morale, and the predictability of your spend.
What the Vendor Chase Really Looks Like
Vendor chase goes beyond “vendors being slow.” You have to consider manual coordination required to keep basic work moving.
It usually looks like some combination of:
- A store manager calling twice toconfirm a technician is actually coming
- A facilities coordinator emailingfor updates because nothing is visible in the system
- A ticket closed with nodocumentation, photos, or notes
- A repair that “worked” for a week,then failed again
- An invoice that arriveslate, unclear, or priced differently than expected
None of those moments is headline-worthy. But across HVAC, plumbing, electrical, doors, refrigeration, janitorial, and handyman work, they create an endless cycle of small interruptions that add up to a major drag on the organization.
Why It Breaks Down at 100+ Locations
The vendor chase gets worse as portfolios grow because variability grows with them. Different regions use different providers. Expectations change by market. Response times and pricing vary. Documentation habits range from thorough to nonexistent.
Even if you have strong vendors in a few cities, a multi-site brand can’t run on “a few cities.” Customers experience one brand standard, and inconsistency shows quickly.
This is the core challenge: when outcomes depend on geography, facilities performance becomes inconsistent by design.
The Costs You Don’t See on the Invoice
The most expensive part of vendor chase is rarely the repair itself. Store teams lose time in the middle of busy days coordinating access and tracking status. Facilities leaders get dragged into escalations that should never reach them. Facilities teams spend days following up instead of managing the portfolio strategically.
Over time, vendor chase creates predictable financial impact:
- Emergency premiums from delayedresponses
- Repeat dispatches because problemsaren’t solved correctly the first time
- Overtime labor when repairsdisrupt peak operations
- Budget unpredictability frominconsistent pricing and documentation
It also creates a trust gap. When store managers stop believing help is on the way, they escalate earlier and rely on workarounds. Eliminating vendor chase requires structure: standardized workflows, defined expectations, and measurable accountability across the portfolio.
Visibility Turns Follow-Up Into Control
A major reason vendor chase persists is the lack of true portfolio-wide visibility. Without insight into aging tickets, SLA gaps, and repeat assets, facilities teams end up managing by escalation. Visibility changes that dynamic. It allows facilities leadership to intervene early, address patterns instead of single work orders, and reduce repeat volume that drives most of the chaos.
The biggest wins usually come when leaders stop treating recurring issues as isolated events. The same HVAC unit failing every few weeks is an asset strategy problem. The same door issue reopening monthly becomes a pattern that needs root-cause resolution.
Where Integrated Facilities Management
Fits In
Integrated Facilities Management (IFM) is the most direct path to eliminating vendor chase because it replaces fragmented coordination with a single operating model.
Under an IFMapproach, multi-site operators gain:
- One intake and dispatch workflowacross all locations
- A vetted provider networkoperating under consistent standards
- Standardized pricing and clearerinvoice governance
- Portfolio-wide performancereporting and accountability
- Preventive maintenance routinesthat reduce emergency volume
The goal is fewersurprises, fewer repeat failures, and less time spent asking for updates.
The Bottom Line
At 100+ locations, vendor chase is a structure problem.
When work depends on store-level coordination, regional variability, and inconsistent closeout expectations, chasing is inevitable. When the operating model is centralized, standardized, and measurable, chasing becomes unnecessary.
Integrated Facilities Management provides the structure that allows facilities teams to stop managing by follow-up and start managing performance, across every location and every market.
Advance Your FM Program to the Next Level
This free ebook outlines the 5 most important pieces to unlocking the full potential of an integrated facilities management program.
